ATI Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition: Competition in the Mac Market
by Anand Lal Shimpi on January 5, 2005 7:38 PM EST- Posted in
- Mac
Dual Dual Link
Before the launch of their 30” Cinema Display, Apple went to ATI and NVIDIA with the requirements of the new display to get an idea of what graphics cards would support it. Apple ended up launching the new displays (along with the new 2.5GHz Power Mac) with NVIDIA’s GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL, even though ATI was ready to go with the X800 XT Mac Edition. All of Apple’s new Cinema Displays are DVI only, so in order to understand the reason Apple chose NVIDIA’s GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL over ATI’s Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition you have to know a little bit about the DVI specification.
The DVI spec transmits data using the transition minimized differential signaling (TMDS) protocol. The DVI spec calls for each DVI output to have at least one TMDS “link” consisting of three data channels (RGB) and one control channel. The maximum speed at which a single 10-bit TMDS link may operate at is 165MHz, offering 1.65Gbps of bandwidth. In real world terms, this means a single 10-bit TMDS link can drive a display at up to 1920 x 1200 (the actual maximum resolution can vary depending on the panel). For most displays that’s not a problem, but Apple’s 30” Cinema Display has a native resolution of 2560 x 1600, which exceeds the bandwidth a single TMDS link can deliver. So what do you do? Remember that the DVI spec calls for at least one TMDS link, but each DVI port can support up to two TMDS links, doubling the maximum bandwidth and thus enabling support for Apple’s 30” display.
To support a single 30” Cinema Display, you simply need a card with one dual-link DVI port. To support a 30” Cinema Display and a second panel with a 1920 x 1200 (or lower) resolution you’d need one dual-link DVI port and one single-link DVI port. However to support two 30” Cinema Displays, you need a card with two dual-link DVI ports. And this is what separates the NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL from the X800 XT Mac Edition.
The GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL uses two external dual-link TMDS transmitters manufactured by Silicon Image – the 178CT64. The two transmitters are located on the back of the card and drive the two dual-link DVI outputs, enabling any possible display configuration with the NVIDIA card.
Two Dual-Link TMDS transmitters on the back of NVIDIA's 6800 Ultra DDL
The ATI Radeon 9800 Pro Mac Special Edition features a single external TMDS transmitter and one internal TMDS transmitter, both single-link. The external TMDS transmitter is also manufactured by Silicon Image, the 164CT64.
ATI's 9800 Pro Mac SE uses a single link TMDS transmitter
The new Radeon X800 XT Mac Edition still has the same internal single-link TMDS transmitter as the Radeon 9800 Pro Mac SE, but now features a 24-bit internal VDO port. The internal port can connect to two external TMDS links to provide a dual-link DVI output. ATI actually uses the same Silicon Image TMDS transmitter as NVIDIA, the 178CT64, and interfaces to it using their internal 24-bit VDO port. The internal TMDS is only single link so the X800 XT Mac Edition uses that to drive its ADC port, while the external dual-link TMDS drives the dual-link DVI port. ATI’s inability to drive two 30” Cinema Displays is what gave NVIDIA the design win with the 2.5GHz G5 system, but ATI insists that very few users will have two 30” displays and thus the flexibility of one ADC and one dual-link DVI connector is more than enough for the majority of the market.
The new X800 XT Mac Edition only features one external dual-link TMDS transmitter
So immediately off the bat, if you want to run two 30” Cinema Displays, then your only option continues to be the GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL. Otherwise, the X800 XT Mac Edition is still in the running.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
35 Comments
View All Comments
a2daj - Wednesday, January 5, 2005 - link
I forgot to add that I enjoyed the depth of the article, particularly the information about dual-link DVI. Hopefully, that will clear up some common misconceptions regarding DL DVI.aliasfox - Wednesday, January 5, 2005 - link
I applaud the Mac benchmarking- handled in a fair and objective manner, with the professionalism I've come to expect from AnandTech. If you can get your hands on Motion, that is apparently a non-game graphics card intensive program.As I read through the article, I missed one important fact: what setting is the processor set on the G5? All G5 desktops offer the option of running the processor always at highest (in this case, 2.0 GHz), or at a lower speed, the "Reduced" setting. Reduced cranks up processor performance on demand, but the performance difference between that and Highest is still noticeable under the type of scrutiny that AnandTech does.
Now, before any PC user wonders why there are power settings on a desktop machine, let me offer an answer: when you don't need the processor (when you're typing in Word, for example), it throttles down, allowing the entire computer to run cooler, and therefore quieter, as the fans can then run at lower speeds.
a2daj - Wednesday, January 5, 2005 - link
Battlefield 1942 and Jedi Outcast as well as Jedi Academy are both available for Mac OS. Same with Call of Duty. I'm surprised he ended up resorting to RtCW. Call of Duty would have been a more interesting test. Splinter Cell is also available. Anand, if you'd like any info on what to test for Mac gaming I'd be happy to provide some suggestions, particularly when it comes to some of the Mac specific settings in various games.Xbench... ugh. The OpenGL test in Xbench is useless. It's shown scores which allude to a Rage 128 being faster than a Radeon 9800 Pro.
skunkbuster - Wednesday, January 5, 2005 - link
that 6800 Ultra DDL is freakin HUGE!shabby - Wednesday, January 5, 2005 - link
How aboot some doom3/farcry/hl2/sw:bf/sims2/battlefield/jedi/ benchmarks? Oh wait... n/m ;)