Half Life 2 Performance

by Anand Lal Shimpi on October 1, 2003 11:48 PM EST
So of course the one thing everyone asked for was something I couldn't deliver for the first part of the Fall 2003 Video Card roundup - Half Life 2 performance. Of course there were requests for Doom3 performance and believe me, if we had the benchmarks we would definitely have included them. As you can guess, Valve has not released the Half Life 2 benchmark as originally expected and thus we don't have updated Half Life 2 numbers for you. The conclusion of the recent article did reference Doom3 and Half Life 2 performance however, and believe me I wasn't just pulling numbers and thoughts out of the air - I've got some basis for what I've said.

Here are some Half Life 2 numbers for you to look at; they were provided by a reliable source, but I could not verify anything myself so take them with a grain of salt. ATI was running in their DX9 codepath and the mixed mode codepath was used for NVIDIA. No AA/AF was enabled and we're looking at 1024x768 scores:

Half Life 2 Demo
Radeon 9800XT
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
e3_bugbait
71.4
73.9
e3_c17_01
57.6
57.5
e3_c17_02
49.9
49.3
e3_phystown
74.5
77.2
e3_seafloor
53.9
53.3
e3_techdemo_5
83.5
64.5
e3_techdemo_6
76.9
71.7
e3_under_02
77.3
71.1

If those numbers hold true then things definitely look better than from Half Life 2 day, but we'll reserve judgement until we get the benchmark in house. I just thought you'd like to see what we're seeing, I wouldn't draw any conclusions based on this data yet, just wanted to share :)

Tomorrow is my 8AM day again, and maybe I'll get those tests back that I took on Monday (hopefully not...I'd like tomorrow to be a good day :)...). I'm off to sleep, have a good night everyone. Derek and I will be back to work on Part II tomorrow; I'll update you as soon as I can.

Comments Locked

102 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    It is not sucky FX series that is annoying.
    It is neverending nvidia cheats/major hardware sites endorsing it that is extremely annoying.
  • mike - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    dood do you guys get together in little groups at your homes and just hate on nvidia til the bright and early morning? why so much animosity? how sad is that. "look fool my shit goes 5 fps faster!!" who gives a shit? nvidia was the top dog for a while, now it's ATi's turn. this is how business goes. you watch, soon ATi will slip up and nvidia will be back on top. so just save your breath and shut the hell up, and don't call me an nvidia apologist either, cause i have a 9800 pro in my system right now, but before that i had a geforce 3. so just find something else to get your panties in a bunch ladies...
  • Anonymous - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    Ati is good, ATI outperforms everything
    Ati is good, ATI outperforms everything
    Ati is good, ATI outperforms everything

    Do you repeat those 1000 times in front of the mirror, every day?
  • Anonymous - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    Yes it will, because nVidiot fuck ups will always defend, and forgive ncheatia no matter what!
  • TB - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    This gen both ATI and nvidia screwed up. Most companies screw at least something up in their new products but most of the time it can be fixed or disabled. Okay so nvidias issues in this gen (doesnt effect GF4/GF3 etc) cant be fixed. Fine, but whos to say the nv40 wont be amazing? We have 4 + companies offering DX9 technology now or in the near future, these sorts of mistakes wont be a common thing for long. In the end, buy what ya need, or wait for next gen.
  • God - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    Yeah.. nVidia is cheating. If you can't grasp that concept yet, Then you are a dumb mofo loser! It's time to take the nVidia shrine down and face the facts that they are Cheating!

    And to the losers above, nVidia left the discussions about DX9 because MS didn't bend to their demands of making their stuff in DX9. So why don't you guys read up before knowing what really happend and why the FX sucks in DX9... Pffft.
  • God - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    Yeah.. nVidia is cheating. If you can't grasp that concept yet, Then you are a dumb mofo loser! It's time to take the nVidia shrine down and face the facts that they are Cheating!

    And to the losers above, nVidia left the discussions about DX9 because MS didn't bend to their demands of making their stuff in DX9. So why don't you guys read up before knowing what really happend and why the FX sucks in DX9... Pffft.
  • God - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    Yeah.. nVidia is cheating. If you can't grasp that concept yet, Then you are a dumb mofo loser! It's time to take the nVidia shrine down and face the facts that they are Cheating!

    And to the losers above, nVidia left the discussions about DX9 because MS didn't bend to their demands of making their stuff in DX9. So why don't you guys read up before knowing what really happend and why the FX sucks in DX9... Pffft.
  • Anonymous - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    its amazing how the nvidia fanboys say something to bash someone when the other party is just telling facts. Go get a real card ( ati ) nvidia is cheating crap
  • Anonymous - Thursday, October 2, 2003 - link

    Why it's called cheats? Because we know it has architectural problems.
    These big hardware sites never publicize the hardware problem of FX series properly. And everytime nvidia cheats with new driver, they just accept it and spew it to readers. They just do that over and over again.
    That's why ppl criticize nvidia and hardware sites like [H], AT, Tom's over and over again.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now