So of course everyone has been asking for benchmarks of the Radeon 9600XT, and next week we'll be able to provide you with them. Right now we're in the early formulation stages of the review and I wanted to get some feedback from you all in terms of what you'd like to see included.
Keep in mind that we'll be using our new test suite of around 20 benchmarks, so we have to watch what we include in order for there to be enough time to physically publish this thing by next week.
The first question is resolution; since we're talking about cards in the $100 - $200 range and not the top of the line stuff, is testing only at 1024x768 ok? Frame rates at 1600x1200 with these cards aren't exactly playable, so I figured 10x7 tests should be fine. We'd also probably throw in AA/AF tests at the same res, which will also help stress the card.
The next question is what cards do we include? Here's what I'm planning on doing right now:
ATI Radeon 9600XT
ATI Radeon 9600 Pro
ATI Radeon 9700
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
I'd like to stick to 6 cards simply because of the plethora of benchmarks we're running on them (6 cards * 20 benchmarks * 2 tests per benchmark = 240 tests). Anything you'd like to see added? Removed? I can't guarantee that we'll get it in there but I'd like to hear your opinions.
Finally we have to ask what platform we should test on. For this to be simply a video card test we should test on the fastest platform available (Athlon 64 FX 51), however whenever we do something like that we usually get complaints that the system isn't realistic enough and we should test on a cheaper platform. Our reasoning for going with the highest performing CPU is to remove the CPU as a bottleneck and truly figure out which video card is the fastest, but there is still much to be said about using a more reasonably priced test bed. My inclination right now is to use the Athlon 64 FX as the test platform and do a CPU scaling comparison later, but if we get enough requests to switch platforms I will. I don't think including a second platform would be feasible for this review simply because of the short time period we have to get all the testing done.
As always, your comments are much appreciated and even more desired. So let me know :)
I haven't been getting much sleep lately so I'm thinking a nice 5 or 10 minute nap may be in order before lunch.
Enjoy the day folks, take care.
Keep in mind that we'll be using our new test suite of around 20 benchmarks, so we have to watch what we include in order for there to be enough time to physically publish this thing by next week.
The first question is resolution; since we're talking about cards in the $100 - $200 range and not the top of the line stuff, is testing only at 1024x768 ok? Frame rates at 1600x1200 with these cards aren't exactly playable, so I figured 10x7 tests should be fine. We'd also probably throw in AA/AF tests at the same res, which will also help stress the card.
The next question is what cards do we include? Here's what I'm planning on doing right now:
ATI Radeon 9600XT
ATI Radeon 9600 Pro
ATI Radeon 9700
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
I'd like to stick to 6 cards simply because of the plethora of benchmarks we're running on them (6 cards * 20 benchmarks * 2 tests per benchmark = 240 tests). Anything you'd like to see added? Removed? I can't guarantee that we'll get it in there but I'd like to hear your opinions.
Finally we have to ask what platform we should test on. For this to be simply a video card test we should test on the fastest platform available (Athlon 64 FX 51), however whenever we do something like that we usually get complaints that the system isn't realistic enough and we should test on a cheaper platform. Our reasoning for going with the highest performing CPU is to remove the CPU as a bottleneck and truly figure out which video card is the fastest, but there is still much to be said about using a more reasonably priced test bed. My inclination right now is to use the Athlon 64 FX as the test platform and do a CPU scaling comparison later, but if we get enough requests to switch platforms I will. I don't think including a second platform would be feasible for this review simply because of the short time period we have to get all the testing done.
As always, your comments are much appreciated and even more desired. So let me know :)
I haven't been getting much sleep lately so I'm thinking a nice 5 or 10 minute nap may be in order before lunch.
Enjoy the day folks, take care.
70 Comments
View All Comments
Morten - Friday, October 10, 2003 - link
I'd also like to see the 9700Pro instead of the 9700NP. Just to see if the rumours about 9600TX ~ 9700Pro.I'd rather see a AthlonXP 3200+ (many overclock 2500+ to 3200+) than a Athlon64 FX51. Since these cards are budget cards, they will for the most part, be run on budget systems. And there's no better budget CPU than the 2500+ atm. But this isn't a big issue really. But it would be nice to see though.
Also about using 1024x768 for benchmarking. Personally I'd like to see 1280x1024 included too, but I guess, with these cards, you won't be running 1280x1024. Anyway, I'm not sure, that's why I'd like to know I guess.
If your doing a CPU scaling comparison later, then just use the A64 FX.
hohoh0 - Friday, October 10, 2003 - link
Athlon 64 FX should be fine for testing platform. Any idea when that CPU scaling comparison report will come out?Anonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
Anandtech and Hardocp are the only corporate sites that have not sold themselves to companies and that is what makes them great.There are also small sites that are doing a great job with reviews such as Legit Reviews, Xbit labs, CoolTechZone, ArsTechnica, Gruntville etc. etc. but am also noticing small sites being sold out for money or free stuff. That is unethical.
Anonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
OT: How about a TV Tuner card roundup review? Take all of the stand-alone TV Tuner cards available at NewEgg.com, and comparison test. Including the ATI TV Wonder Pro, MSI TV@nywhere Master, Leadtek, etc. Maybe include 3rd-party software, such as DScaler, ShowShifter, PowerVCR, etc.Also, compatability with Windows Media Center Edition.
Thanks!
Anonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
I NEED A JOVB\
Anonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
Truly NC Y Cali dos gootAnonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
Did u ponys see Jonny0n spluges ....... i didntbAnonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
Epic Truly does until Boy JC spluges on usAnonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
I'm from Calee4nia AND NC RulZAnonymous - Thursday, October 9, 2003 - link
NC Rulz